Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:13:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:13:25 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:1289 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:13:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 03:12:55 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Matthew Johnson Cc: Subject: Re: vm philosophising In-Reply-To: <200201180455.g0I4tw014948@barn.psychohorse.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Matthew Johnson wrote: > > This is an interesting assertion ... but up to date nobody has > > been able to tell me what exactly should be different between > > these two mythical VMs ;) > > Well what is the different requirements for desktop use versus, the > server in terms of virtual memory? That's a good question .... > What I am doing on my system with MP3's playing, running Xfree86 on a > SuSE 7.3 system will be different from a server running DMBS's. .... especially because I haven't seen any suggestion on how these different workloads would get translated into different VM requirements. regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/