Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:06:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:06:20 -0500 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:34828 "HELO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:06:10 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:07:14 +0100 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: Brian Beattie Cc: Mario Mikocevic , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FC & MULTIPATH !? (any hope?) Message-ID: <20020118080714.I937@marowsky-bree.de> In-Reply-To: <20020114123301.B30997@danielle.hinet.hr> <1011310615.519.3.camel@w-beattie1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1011310615.519.3.camel@w-beattie1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2002-01-17T15:36:54, Brian Beattie said: > Probable enhancements to this would include, provideing a method to mark > a path to not attempt this crude form of auto recovery and a way to mark > a failed path as good. Finally a device wide flag to disable > auto-recovery. > > A disadvantage to this approach is that it would potentially, multiply > the amount or time it takes to ultimately fail the attempt, by the > number of paths. This would seem to be acceptable since the alternative > is to fail the operation when a good route might exist. > > I would appreciate any thoughts, flames, or suggestions. Combined with the enhancements this makes a lot of sense. The enhancements are very much required, especially the way to mark a path as good again manually. I would also liks easily parseable /proc file to query the status of a multi-path device, including all paths associated with it. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br?e -- Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/