Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:10:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:10:31 -0500 Received: from styx.suse.cz ([195.70.145.226]:10740 "EHLO kerberos.suse.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:10:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 22:40:18 +0100 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Rusty Russell Cc: Tigran Aivazian , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" from drivers/ide (test11) Message-ID: <20001124224018.A5173@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20001123110203.EB8A8813D@halfway.linuxcare.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001123110203.EB8A8813D@halfway.linuxcare.com.au>; from rusty@linuxcare.com.au on Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 10:01:53PM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 10:01:53PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > In message you write: > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:25:01 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > > > > Quick removal of unnecessary initialization to 0. > > > > Quite the contrary. The patch seems correct and useful to me. What do you > > think is wrong with it? (Linus accepted megabytes worth of the above in > > the past...) > > What irritates about these monkey-see-monkey-do patches is that if I > initialize a variable to NULL, it's because my code actually relies on > it; I don't want that information eliminated. Yes, but if it generates a bigger (== worse) binary? -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/