Message-ID: <4864FEFB.2050405@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:53:47 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
CC: ksummit-2008-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org,
       linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Current List of Kernel Summit suggested
 topics from the discuss	list
References: <1214577710.3394.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1214577710.3394.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1216
Lines: 26

James Bottomley wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> This is the synopsis of the currently suggested topics so far.  That's
> not to say this is the list we will be doing, just to say that if
> there's something you think we should be discussing and it's not on the
> list, now would be a good time to add it (don't trust the programme
> committee magically to add it at the last minute ...)
> 
> James
> 

I'd like to propose a topic about kernel quality; there's been a lot of
lkml traffic about it (in ups and downs). As part of this topic I could present
trends, data and conclusions from the kerneloops.org project. I'm sure Andrew has
a set of data and views from his part of the world, and the regressions topic
could fall under this too. If we, unlike last year, ask various subsystem maintainers
to prepare data or at least something more solid than "eh I think we're fine" ahead of the
conference, we could have a more thought out set of inputs from that direction as well.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/