Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:54:30 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
       Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>, tglx@linutronix.de,
       mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, bhavna.sarathy@amd.com,
       Sebastian.Biemueller@amd.com, robert.richter@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/34] AMD IOMMU: add Kconfig entry
Message-ID: <20080627165430.GD10197@8bytes.org>
References: <1214508490-29683-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1214508490-29683-2-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <20080627142558.GG18644@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <878wwrq6im.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20080627163945.GA26130@il.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080627163945.GA26130@il.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 854
Lines: 21

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:39:45PM -0400, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 04:47:29PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > Also it should ideally describe that there is a trade off between
> > reliability and performance with IOMMU enabled.
> 
> I agree that there's a performance tradeoff with current generation
> hardware and ingerfaces, but it wouldn't be fair to single out a
> single IOMMU implementation ;=)

True. At least for the case without device isolation I have some
optimizations in mind which will minimize the performance tradeoff. I
hope to have them ready for 2.6.28 :)

Joerg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/