Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762281AbYF0UAQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:00:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757638AbYF0UAA (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:00:00 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.31]:38713 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757444AbYF0T77 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:59:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=om5pFPDMa91eWA/htUwh1q4HtTZnLXQgVv7LjVkcM3FLUr7GqArNRbcib9r5nhKajB A7EJVzIoCGc7o81gcxFsafuvAqc08nDERH5Q+vuBFmjgqD5ERiUWdCuLmzU7XKv1wNMQ +xi6OIKbWhg9A4EIGIi6+nYpeILyT0OzCFFdA= Message-ID: <19f34abd0806271259r338ec2c3w3b34e1703d4d97ba@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:59:50 +0200 From: "Vegard Nossum" To: "Adrian Bunk" Subject: Re: -tip build failure: No rule to make target `/etc/sound/dsp001.ld' Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Sam Ravnborg" , LKML In-Reply-To: <20080627194047.GD4306@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <19f34abd0806271225q409dfa51haca8de843eeec76f@mail.gmail.com> <20080627194047.GD4306@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1582 Lines: 45 On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 09:25:05PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was just building a randconfig in tip/master and hit this: >> >> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/etc/sound/dsp001.ld', needed by >> `sound/oss/pss_boot.h'. Stop. >> >> It seems to be done like this on purpose, but it breaks randconfig >> builds. Is this something that should be using firmware API? >> >> I'm attaching the config. Please forward this in the right direction, >> if such a thing exists. > > It's your fault - compile errors with CONFIG_STANDALONE=n are expected. Ah, I see. In that case, shouldn't 'make randconfig' also make sure that this option is always =n? Or do I have to do make randconfig make CONFIG_STANDALONE=n ? Are there any other options which have similar effects (build-time dependencies on the environment) and need to be overridden? Or maybe we could have 'make randconfig' output a helpful explanation in case this option gets set? Thanks for helping out. (Who said that kernel development was easy? ;-)) Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/