Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932161AbYF0XXU (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:23:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759142AbYF0XXK (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:23:10 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:40324 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754260AbYF0XXJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:23:09 -0400 Message-ID: <48657636.8070208@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:22:30 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Linux Kernel Organization, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glauber Costa CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/39] don't use word-size specifiers References: <1214602486-17080-1-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <1214602486-17080-2-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <1214602486-17080-3-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <1214602486-17080-4-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <1214602486-17080-5-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <1214602486-17080-6-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <1214602486-17080-7-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <1214602486-17080-8-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <1214602486-17080-9-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <48657524.4020307@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <48657524.4020307@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1301 Lines: 28 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > I hate to say it, but I really think this is a step backwards in > readability. Consistency is a good thing, and with the suffixes in > place we are consistent between instructions that refer to memory and > instructions that refer to registers. We also get one more check on > things, where the assembler can tell the programmer he probably typoed. > > So I would prefer if we *didn't* go down this route, except for explicit > unification, but that's not the case here (since the size is still > explicit in the register names.) > Okay, I didn't really explain what I meant very well here... Obviously, most of your patch series is all about unification, and that is a Good Thing, and thank you for doing it. What I was trying to say was that it is not obvious from just reading the patchset what changes are necessary for unification, and which one are a stylistic change. If *all* the changes are unification, please just say so and disregard this remark, and I'll go ahead and apply your patchset. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/