Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754753AbYF1L4H (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:56:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751244AbYF1Lz5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:55:57 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:58948 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750845AbYF1Lz4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:55:56 -0400 Message-ID: <486626C8.7070705@firstfloor.org> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:55:52 +0200 From: Andi Kleen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Connors CC: Peter Zijlstra , dipankar@in.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Linux Kernel , Suresh B Siddha , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Ingo Molnar , Vatsa , Gautham R Shenoy Subject: Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n References: <20080625191100.GI21892@dirshya.in.ibm.com> <87k5gcqpbm.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <4863AF57.3040005@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4863DB29.1020304@firstfloor.org> <20080626185254.GA12416@dirshya.in.ibm.com> <4863F93C.9040102@firstfloor.org> <20080626210025.GB26167@in.ibm.com> <48640C04.9020600@firstfloor.org> <1214516584.12265.10.camel@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <48641A7D.6080204@firstfloor.org> <1214553090.2801.7.camel@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <48649F84.4090501@firstfloor.org> <12146524137149-twc@hexane.ssi.swin.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <12146524137149-twc@hexane.ssi.swin.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 762 Lines: 22 Tim Connors wrote: > Andi Kleen said on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:06:28 +0200: >> Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> disappeared then I'd call that a huge usability regression. Basically >>> making ondemand useless. >>> >>> /me checks,.. >>> >>> Yeah, on F9, my opteron runs at 1GHz when idle, but when I start distcc, >>> which like said runs on nice 19, the cpu speed goes up to 2.4GHz. >> Ok distcc is a special case, > > No it's not. You're arguing against the current default of ondemand then. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/