Message-ID: <48671FF6.1070501@qumranet.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:39:02 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= <edwintorok@gmail.com>,
       Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ctrl+C doesn't interrupt process waiting for I/O
References: <48661488.10304@gmail.com> <4866F6FE.9000503@goop.org> <486704AC.2090207@qumranet.com> <48671A12.90205@goop.org>
In-Reply-To: <48671A12.90205@goop.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1465
Lines: 34

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, it's intended behaviour.  Filesystem IO syscalls are considered 
>>> "fast" and are interruptible.  Usermode code can reasonably expect 
>>> that file IO will never return EINTR.
>>
>> That's filesystem dependent; if you mount an nfs filesystem with the 
>> 'intr' mount option, it will be interruptible (which makes sense, as 
>> it is impossible to guarantee the server's responsiveness).
>
> 'intr' is a pretty bad idea, and I would never recommend it ('soft' is 
> better).  It's an excellent way to destroy data when a stray signal 
> causes a syscall to fail with EINTR in an unexpected way (write being 
> the obvious one, but link, unlink, truncate or even close can fail in 
> odd ways can cause havok).
>

Applications should not assume that write() (or other syscalls) can't 
return EINTR.  Not all filesystems have a bounded-time backing store.

'soft' has its own problems; namely false positives when someone steps 
on the network cable, temporarily blocking packet flow, or when using a 
clustered server which may take some time to recover from a fault.


-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/