Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755947AbYF2XO0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:14:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752986AbYF2XOO (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:14:14 -0400 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:39550 "EHLO tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752898AbYF2XOM (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:14:12 -0400 Message-Id: From: "Takashi Sato" To: "Andrew Morton" Cc: , , , , , , , References: <20080624160056t-sato@mail.jp.nec.com><20080624150925.765155f0.akpm@linux-foundation.org><7B349EFCD35842D4ADAEB402D2BDCA4E@nsl.ad.nec.co.jp> <20080627115727.149dcb2e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080627115727.149dcb2e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:13:07 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1415 Lines: 43 Hi, >> >> case XFS_FSOP_GOING_FLAGS_DEFAULT: { >> >> - struct super_block *sb = freeze_bdev(mp->m_super->s_bdev); >> >> + struct super_block *sb = freeze_bdev(mp->m_super->s_bdev, 0); >> > >> > Using NULL here is clearer and will, I expect, avoid a sparse warning. >> >> I checked it but I couldn't find a sparse warning in xfs_fsops.c. >> Can you tell me how to use NULL? > > struct super_block *sb = freeze_bdev(mp->m_super->s_bdev, NULL); > > :) > > It's much better to use NULL here rather than literal zero because the > reader of this code can then say "ah-hah, we're passing in a pointer". > Whereas plain old "0" could be a pointer or a scalar. The second argument's type of freeze_bdev() is "long", not pointer as below. struct super_block *freeze_bdev(struct block_device *, long timeout_msec); So "0" is reasonable, isn't it? > We should always use NULL to represent a null pointer in the kernel. > The one acceptable exception is when testing for nullness: > > if (ptr1) > if (!ptr2) > > Often people will use > > if (ptr1 != NULL) > if (ptr2 == NULL) > > in this case as well. (I prefer the shorter version personally, but > either is OK). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/