Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:13:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:13:35 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:30985 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:13:21 -0500 Subject: Re: vm philosophising To: oxymoron@waste.org (Oliver Xymoron) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 19:23:47 +0000 (GMT) Cc: riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel), bole@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu (Bosko Radivojevic), J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl (Erik Mouw), andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Oliver Xymoron" at Jan 18, 2002 12:39:54 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > There is another VM that has a property that people would like: > deterministically handling memory exhaustion. Unfortunately, that VM > probably can't co-exist with over-commit and the performance gains that > affords. It can definitely co-exist. Overcommit control is just a book keeping exercise on address space commits. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/