Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761061AbYF3NoO (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:44:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754137AbYF3NoA (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:44:00 -0400 Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.150]:27216 "EHLO mtagate1.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753917AbYF3NoA (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:44:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:43:49 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrew Morton , Gautham R Shenoy , Max Krasnyansky , Paul Jackson , Paul Menage , Peter Zijlstra , Vegard Nossum , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueues: make get_online_cpus() useable for work->func() Message-ID: <20080630134349.GB7686@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <20080629165131.GA11215@tv-sign.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080629165131.GA11215@tv-sign.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1510 Lines: 39 On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 08:51:31PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > workqueue_cpu_callback(CPU_DEAD) flushes cwq->thread under > cpu_maps_update_begin(). This means that the multithreaded workqueues can't > use get_online_cpus() due to the possible deadlock, very bad and very old > problem. > > Introduce the new state, CPU_POST_DEAD, which is called after > cpu_hotplug_done() but before cpu_maps_update_done(). > > Change workqueue_cpu_callback() to use CPU_POST_DEAD instead of CPU_DEAD. > This means that create/destroy functions can't rely on get_online_cpus() > any longer and should take cpu_add_remove_lock instead. Ah, nice! > --- 26-rc2/kernel/cpu.c~WQ_4_GET_ONLINE_CPUS 2008-05-18 15:44:18.000000000 +0400 > +++ 26-rc2/kernel/cpu.c 2008-06-29 20:03:19.000000000 +0400 > @@ -261,6 +261,11 @@ out_allowed: > set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old_allowed); > out_release: > cpu_hotplug_done(); > + if (!err) { This should be (!err && !cpu_online(cpu)), no? This is because it might be that __stop_machine_run() succeeded, but take_cpu_down() failed and therefore our cpu is still online. Which in turn is not good when doing this: > + if (raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_POST_DEAD | mod, > + hcpu) == NOTIFY_BAD) > + BUG(); > + } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/