Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:25:06 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
       Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
       Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 30
Message-ID: <20080630202506.GA28050@uranus.ravnborg.org>
References: <20080701001656.e156585c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <48690385.7030500@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <48690D3C.1060803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080630185943.GA24692@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080630192610.GA6584@elte.hu> <20080630194727.GA26682@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080630200623.GE6584@elte.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080630200623.GE6584@elte.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 759
Lines: 19

> 
> ah, ok. So the patch below should solve this for now?
> 
> is there any particular reason why we are limited to 100 sections? (is 
> there some ELF limitation here perhaps?)

I would still like to know if you see significant different numbers than Kamalesh.
If you see a number close to 100 then OK.
But if you see a number say in the range of below 80 then we should dive deeper into this.

I do not even know what the program does - never looked at it befoe
so why the original limit was 100 I dunno.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/