Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934206AbYF3Vzg (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:55:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933555AbYF3VwT (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:52:19 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:49631 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764596AbYF3VwP (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:52:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4869558A.9020907@goop.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:52:10 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean Young CC: Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Anvin" Subject: Re: Regression: boot failure on AMD Elan TS-5500 References: <20080616121138.GA51097@atlantis.8hz.com> <200806162327.34912.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <48566C88.6000702@goop.org> <20080616161944.GA53539@atlantis.8hz.com> <20080630214347.GA57988@atlantis.8hz.com> In-Reply-To: <20080630214347.GA57988@atlantis.8hz.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2681 Lines: 83 Sean Young wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 04:19:44PM +0000, Sean Young wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 06:37:12AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> >>> Rusty Russell wrote: >>> >>>> On Monday 16 June 2008 22:11:39 Sean Young wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> The symptons are either a crash or reboot on booting the kernel. No >>>>> printk's have occurred yet -- even with early printk on. >>>>> >>>>> 2.6.15 worked on this board however current does not. I've bisected it to: >>>>> >>>>> commit a24e785111a32ccb7cebafd24b1b1cb474ea8e5d >>>>> Author: Rusty Russell >>>>> Date: Sun Oct 21 16:41:35 2007 -0700 >>>>> >>>>> i386: paravirt boot sequence >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Hi Sean, >>>> >>>> Thanks for tracking this down. Can we try reverting this in pieces to >>>> see exactly what the cause was? >>>> >>>> 1) Revert arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.S >>>> 2) If that doesn't fix it, Try removing the 8 lines which were added to >>>> arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S >>>> >>>> >>> And the arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc_32.c change too, just in case... >>> >> Reverting only head_32.S makes the problem go away. I didn't try any other >> changes. >> > > Looking at the beginning of startup_32, it seems ds is used before it is set: > > startup_32: > cld > /* test KEEP_SEGMENTS flag to see if the bootloader is asking > * us to not reload segments */ > testb $(1<<6), BP_loadflags(%esi) > jnz 1f > > cli > movl $(__BOOT_DS),%eax > movl %eax,%ds > movl %eax,%es > movl %eax,%fs > movl %eax,%gs > movl %eax,%ss > 1: > > Since the testb instruction is a dereference, ds is implicitly used. If > I move the testb to after "movl %eax,%ds" it seems to work (not that it > would make any sense there, but just to prove the point). > > 1) Am I barking up the wrong tree? > > 2) If I'm right I have no idea what the correct solution is; it seems that > a chicken & egg issue is introduced. > > Please advise. I am very new to all of this. It's a bit odd that the boot loader neglected to set up ds properly, but changing the testb line to testb $(1<<6), %cs:BP_loadflags(%esi) should work. (Or perhaps a %ss: override would be better?) I'm assuming that the GDT setup isn't completely mad and that the segments have the same base at least. J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/