Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933995AbYF3WUe (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:20:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762946AbYF3WUS (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:20:18 -0400 Received: from chrocht.moloch.sk ([62.176.169.44]:36689 "EHLO mail.moloch.sk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763187AbYF3WUR (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:20:17 -0400 Message-ID: <48695C20.6050704@fastmq.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:20:16 +0200 From: Martin Sustrik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080502) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger Heflin CC: Martin Lucina , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Higher than expected disk write(2) latency References: <20080628121131.GA14181@nodbug.moloch.sk> <48663873.5010200@gmail.com> <486921AD.8060308@fastmq.com> <48692DC0.6060904@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48692DC0.6060904@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1394 Lines: 30 Hi Roger, >> Fair enough. That exaplains the behaviour. Would AIO help here? If we >> are able to enqueue next write before the first one is finished, it >> can start writing it immediately without waiting for a revolution. > > If you could get them queued at the disk level, things that would need > to be watched were if the disk can queue things up (and all > controllers/drivers support it), and how many things the disk can queue > up, and how large each of those things can be, if they aren't queued at > the disk, there is the chance that the machine cannot get the data to > the disk faster enough for that next sector. We'll try with AIO and we'll see what the impact would be. > Depending on your application you could always get a small fast solid > state device (no seek or RPM issues), and use it to keep a journal that > could be replayed on an unexpected crash...and then just use various > syncs to force things to disk at various points. Yes, that's one thing we want to do. However, we cannot assume that every user will have SSD, thus we should try to get the best latencies possible even on standard HD. Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/