Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755949AbYGAHvq (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 03:51:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752150AbYGAHvh (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 03:51:37 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:35178 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752412AbYGAHvg (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 03:51:36 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Tejun Heo , Benjamin Thery , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Daniel Lezcano , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Linux Containers References: <20080618170729.808539948@theryb.frec.bull.fr> <20080618170731.002784342@theryb.frec.bull.fr> <485F04E1.70204@gmail.com> <486706C9.9040303@gmail.com> <20080630214421.GA29605@us.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:50:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20080630214421.GA29605@us.ibm.com> (Serge E. Hallyn's message of "Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:44:23 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 24.130.11.59 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;"Serge E. Hallyn" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] sysfs: Implement sysfs tagged directory support. X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mgr1.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 835 Lines: 18 "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > Now that the iproute2 patch is upstream, this patchset really is the > only thing keeping us from using network namespaces. Given that the > details of the tagging are trivially changeable with no abi changes, I'd > personally much rather see the patches go in as is, with whatever new > tagging patches Benjamin whips up, using ida or some new idea, being > applied later if we feel the need. My point exactly. No one seems to contest the userspace semantics so as long as we don't put ourselves into a real mess we should be fine. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/