Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759248AbYGAOrf (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:47:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754260AbYGAOr1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:47:27 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:38717 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753749AbYGAOr0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:47:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:46:58 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Greg KH Cc: Roland McGrath , Thomas Gleixner , TAKADA Yoshihito , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] x86 ptrace: fix PTRACE_GETFPXREGS error Message-ID: <20080701144658.GA18522@elte.hu> References: <20080630.134445.193700135.takada@mbf.nifty.com> <20080630210241.93738154077@magilla.localdomain> <20080701090204.GA1729@elte.hu> <20080701093212.6D9DA15420E@magilla.localdomain> <20080701101104.GF31309@elte.hu> <20080701143418.GA30693@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080701143418.GA30693@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1447 Lines: 37 * Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:11:04PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Roland McGrath wrote: > > > > > > since the original fix is already upstream, i've applied the delta > > > > patch below. Should we still do this for v2.6.26 or can we defer it > > > > to v2.6.27? As ptrace is the only user of this facility for now this > > > > would be an identity transformation AFAICS and the v2.6.26 release > > > > is very close. > > > > > > I don't think there's a problem with 2.6.26 either way. I agree that > > > the user_regset internal API does not matter much before 2.6.27. > > > > okay - i've queued it up in tip/x86/ptrace for now. > > > > > My patch alone applies to 2.6.25, which is why I CC'd it to stable. I > > > think applying that (and not takada's patch) to stable-2.6.25 would be > > > best. > > > > i think Greg already queued the original fix up for v2.6.25, as per the > > commit notifier below. > > Yes I did queue that one up, but it looks different from Roland's > original patch in this thread. yes, but as discussed in this thread, both patches are fine in principle as far as the regression goes. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/