Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758016AbYGAP50 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:57:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753720AbYGAP5Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:57:16 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:53674 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753416AbYGAP5P (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:57:15 -0400 Message-ID: <486A5378.7020601@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 08:55:36 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, ACPI Devel Maling List , LKML , pm list , Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume References: <200807010148.02135.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080701063133.GC16642@elte.hu> <4869D67B.4060902@zytor.com> <486A2AC3.2060107@firstfloor.org> In-Reply-To: <486A2AC3.2060107@firstfloor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1468 Lines: 38 Andi Kleen wrote: >> It still seems incredibly risky to push this for 2.6.26, especially >> given the Elan revelation. > > Do Elans even support S3? I don't know if they do, but I don't know offhand the extent of machines that may have that problem, especially since Intel now document it as "failures are readily seen". >> I think it needs to be tested on the 2.6.27 >> track, and then possibly be pushed back via the 2.6.26-stable route. > > I'm just not sure how many suspend/resume cycles people really do > on a early (pre -rc) mainline kernel (or in linux-next for that > matter). You usually have to install on a laptop and actually > use it. > > Since this code is only executed on resume some directed testing > would be better. That is what Rafael asked for in this mail. The issue is mostly if it breaks some obscure system. I have put it on my laptop, Ingo has it on this test system with a suspend-testing cycle, and so on, but the number of systems exposed is going to be small. > I think it would be ok for .26 if we can get confirmation it works > on a few systems with S3 suspend/resume. That we already know it does, but it took a long time even until the regression came to light. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/