Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760740AbYGAUb6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:31:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756321AbYGAUbu (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:31:50 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:49638 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753268AbYGAUbu (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:31:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 22:31:23 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Nick Piggin , Mark McLoughlin , xen-devel , Eduardo Habkost , Vegard Nossum , Stephen Tweedie , x86@kernel.org, LKML , Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support Message-ID: <20080701203123.GG4896@elte.hu> References: <20080627160333.GA27072@elte.hu> <486539A3.3030102@goop.org> <20080629084318.GA28815@elte.hu> <48684CD4.7040403@goop.org> <20080630082135.GA22844@elte.hu> <20080630092209.GA29815@elte.hu> <48696690.90907@goop.org> <20080701085204.GA23289@elte.hu> <20080701092152.GA18918@elte.hu> <486A57C8.3010008@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <486A57C8.3010008@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1186 Lines: 37 * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> Excluding the x86/xen-64bit topic solves the problem. >> >> It triggered on two 64-bit machines so it seems readily reproducible >> with that config. >> >> i've pushed the failing tree out to tip/tmp.xen-64bit.Tue_Jul__1_10_55 >> > > The patch to fix this is on tip/x86/unify-setup: "x86: setup_arch() && > early_ioremap_init()". Logically that patch should probably be in the > xen64 branch, since it's only meaningful with the early_ioremap > unification. ah, indeed - it was missing from tip/master due to: | commit ac998c259605741efcfbd215533b379970ba1d9f | Author: Ingo Molnar | Date: Mon Jun 30 12:01:31 2008 +0200 | | Revert "x86: setup_arch() && early_ioremap_init()" | | This reverts commit 181b3601a1a7d2ac3ace6b23cb3204450a4f9a27. because that change needed the other changes from xen-64bit. will retry tomorrow. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/