Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759008AbYGAUt5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:49:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755086AbYGAUts (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:49:48 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:45040 "HELO xenotime.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754999AbYGAUtq (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:49:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:41:00 -0700 (PDT) From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-X-Sender: rddunlap@shark.he.net To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: inux-next: Tree for July 1 In-Reply-To: <200807012236.19400.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: References: <20080702011434.6fb403d5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200807012236.19400.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2355 Lines: 67 On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 1 of July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since next-20080630: > > > > New tree: ttydev - unfortunately it had to be reverted because of build > > failures after lots of conflict resolution (which may have caused the > > build failures). > > > > Changed tree: the cris tree changed branch names. > > > > The sched tree gained a couple of conflicts against the ftrace and > > cpus4096 trees. > > > > The pci tree gained a conflict against the x86 tree. > > > > The usb tree reverted due to a build failure after merging with the pci > > tree was changed for a fixup patch. > > > > The v4l-dvb tree lost its three conflicts against Linus' tree. > > > > The s390 tree gained a conflict against the diver-core tree. > > > > The ide tree fixed its build problems. > > > > The nfsd tree lost a conflict against the nfs tree. > > > > The powerpc tree gained a conflict against the ide tree. > > > > The net tree gained two conflicts against the powerpc tree. > > > > The galak tree lost its conflict against the net tree. > > > > the blk-removal tree gained a conflict against the s390 tree. > > > > The firmware tree lost several conflicts against the net tree so didn't > > need a commit reverted any more. > > > > Merging the ttydev tree got several conflicts against the usb and > > firmware trees. Unfortunately, it also would not build and so was > > reverted. > > > > I have also applied the following patches for know problems: > > module: fix NULL pointer dereference in find_symbol() > > I can't mount NFS shares with this kernel. I get something of this sort in > dmesg and it seems to be 100% reproducible: > > [ 314.058858] RPC: Registered udp transport module. > [ 314.058863] RPC: Registered tcp transport module. > [ 314.490970] RPC: transport (0) not supported > [ 319.246987] __ratelimit: 23 messages suppressed > > linux-next from yesterday was fine with the same .config . Same problem for me. Thanks for reporting it. I wondered if it was something that I did wrong... -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/