Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763151AbYGBLsj (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 07:48:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755691AbYGBLsa (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 07:48:30 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:44230 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755239AbYGBLs3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 07:48:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18539.27303.187681.716560@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:46:47 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Andrew Morton Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com Subject: Re: Is sysfs the right place to get cache and CPU topology info? In-Reply-To: <20080702030154.67a851d2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <18539.8141.683072.967851@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20080702003755.4daff613.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <18539.20039.516803.51920@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20080702030154.67a851d2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.9 under Emacs 22.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1465 Lines: 34 Andrew Morton writes: > Oh. I thought "they" (or you) were proposing adding some new > topology-exporting files to sysfs. I was proposing adding them on powerpc using the same format and location as x86 already uses. That way the HPC library can use the one parsing routine on both x86 and powerpc. > If they're talking about using the existing ones then sure, those are > cast in stone as far as I'm concerned. > > But they do need to be a _bit_ defensive. If they see a file which has > multiple name:value fields (shouldn't happen) then don't fail if new > tuples turn up later on. Don't expect them to always be in the same > order. Don't fail if new files later turn up in a sysfs directory. If > a file has (a stupid) format like /proc/self/stat then be prepared for > new columns to appear later on, etc. > > But if basic and obvious steps like that are taken in the library, and > later kernel changes cause that library to break, we get to fix the > kernel to unbreak their library. I assume they can rely on finding the stuff they need under /sys/devices/system/cpu. Or do they need to traverse the whole of /sys, and if so, how would they know which directories they should be looking in? Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/