Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S289039AbSASNmb>; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 08:42:31 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S289211AbSASNmV>; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 08:42:21 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:60174 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S289031AbSASNmC>; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 08:42:02 -0500
Subject: Re: clarification about redhat and vm
To: cr@sap.com (Christoph Rohland)
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 13:54:04 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli),
        wilhelm.nuesser@sap.com (Wilhelm Nuesser),
        alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel)
In-Reply-To: <m3wuye397w.fsf@linux.local> from "Christoph Rohland" at Jan 19, 2002 11:50:59 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E16Rvwa-0001ES-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> BTW since we are just bashing VMs: I always hear that 2.2 is so much
> better: The first 2.2 kernel which could really survive this test was
> 2.2.19!

That I can believe. With the exception of the dcache balancing problem the
2.2.19/20 VM basically eliminated all 2.2 bug reports on VM behaviour.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/