Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760808AbYGBWTe (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:19:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757415AbYGBWTO (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:19:14 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:36428 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758715AbYGBWTN (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:19:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:16:00 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Andi Kleen , Nathan Lynch , Andrew Morton , Paul Mackerras , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Removing sysdevs? (was: Re: Is sysfs the right place to get cache and CPU topology info?) Message-ID: <20080702221600.GB17929@kroah.com> References: <18539.8141.683072.967851@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <200807022341.44965.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080702214853.GA10451@kroah.com> <200807030008.46851.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200807030008.46851.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2636 Lines: 55 On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 12:08:45AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, 2 of July 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:41:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 2 of July 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 05:14:02PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > Nathan Lynch wrote: > > > > > > Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > >> Andrew Morton writes: > > > > > >>> sysfs is part of the kernel ABI. We should design our interfaces there > > > > > >>> as carefully as we design any others. > > > > > >> The basic problem is that sysfs exports an internal kernel object model > > > > > >> and these tend to change. To really make it stable would require > > > > > >> splitting it into internal and presented interface. > > > > > > > > > > > > True, but... /sys/devices/system/cpu has been there since around 2.6.5 > > > > > > iirc. A google code search for that path shows plenty of programs > > > > > > (including hal) that hard-code it. Exposed object model or not, > > > > > > changing that path would break lots of software. > > > > > > > > > > Yes it would. > > > > > > > > > > But Greg is making noises of getting rid of sysdevs and it wouldn't > > > > > surprise me if that ended up being user visible since most object > > > > > model changes end up being visible. > > > > > > > > I hope to make sysdevs go away in such a manner that the sysfs tree does > > > > not change at all. That's my goal, but we still have a long ways to go > > > > before we can even consider attempting to do this, so don't worry about > > > > putting things in this location if you feel it is the best fit. > > > > > > Speaking of which, I'm very interested in the removing of sysdevs, since they > > > don't fit into the new suspend/hibernation framework I'm working on. Can you > > > please tell me what the plan is? > > > > The plan is: > > - remaining driver core cleanups to allow for multiple drivers > > to be bound to individual devices > > - add multiple binding support to the core > > - migrate existing sysdevs to struct device, now that multiple > > binding is allowed > > Once they've been migrated to struct device, will they reside on specific > 'system' bus, or will they be platform devices? I haven't really thought it through more than the above yet, so I don't know :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/