Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759857AbYGBWXy (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:23:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754693AbYGBWXo (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:23:44 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:58325 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754525AbYGBWXn (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:23:43 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/23] make section names compatible with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections: v850 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 00:17:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Andrew Morton , vda.linux@googlemail.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, dhowells@redhat.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, kernel@wantstofly.org, jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tim.bird@am.sony.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net References: <200807020242.21960.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <20080702145859.a9af30ea.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <486BFC21.1040001@firstfloor.org> In-Reply-To: <486BFC21.1040001@firstfloor.org> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807030017.53747.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+pO3ulzoL1vYV5myjhiTQYZLPT//yqhIruMsy oskMCewSSGPKHDp7An0sKborDfh18nMsR0orCz1hejs5jy8pDF Ku6IO+n01kmiehd6+myEw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 684 Lines: 17 On Thursday 03 July 2008, Andi Kleen wrote: > Same seems to be true for cris btw. Cris has seen significant updates in 2.6.25 by its maintainer. It's not a very active port, but skipping updates for one kernel version is on a completely different scale from doing nothing at all for over three years as in the v850 case. I don't currently see any architecture (other than v850) in a state that justifies removing it entirely. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/