Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753365AbYGCL4G (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:56:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751711AbYGCLzQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:55:16 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:36305 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751262AbYGCLzN (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:55:13 -0400 Subject: Re: Multiple MSI From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Arnd Bergmann , michaele@au1.ibm.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Kenji Kaneshige , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , David Miller , Dan Williams , Martine.Silbermann@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080703113128.GC14894@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080703024445.GA14894@parisc-linux.org> <1215060119.21182.77.camel@pasglop> <1215067484.17950.35.camel@localhost> <200807031110.30072.arnd@arndb.de> <1215076620.19689.2.camel@pasglop> <20080703113128.GC14894@parisc-linux.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:41:06 +1000 Message-Id: <1215085266.19689.19.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1278 Lines: 31 On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 05:31 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 07:17:00PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Some years ago, we had discussions about getting rid of IRQ numbers > > > altogether, or at least the requirement to have device drivers know > > > about them. Does anyone remember what happened to that idea? > > > > I think it's not totally dead. Last I heard, someone (jgarzik ?) was > > slowly, bit by bit, removing the dependencies on the irq argument on irq > > handlers which is one step in the direction. > > I think that project's dead, Jim. http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/578 Ouch, missed that one... sad, would have been a good idea in the long run. irq_desc array is a big PITA. > You can't do that. /proc/interrupts is so terribly useful for a > sysadmin that you can't remove information from it. You can create a new one with informations about the new stuff.. Anyway, looks like it's not happening and we'll be stuck with the bloody array for the time being. Crap. Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/