Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754096AbYGCRCX (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:02:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752209AbYGCRCL (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:02:11 -0400 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([75.144.35.66]:59930 "EHLO lucidpixels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752043AbYGCRCK (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:02:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:02:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Justin Piszcz To: Roger Heflin cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Veliciraptor HDD 3.0gbps but UDMA/100 on PCI-e controller? In-Reply-To: <486CFC08.3000004@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <486CCB12.7040205@garzik.org> <486CFC08.3000004@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3915 Lines: 85 On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Roger Heflin wrote: > Justin Piszcz wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> >>> Justin Piszcz wrote: >> >> > > Well, given that pcie x1 is max 250MB/second, and a number of pcie cards are > not native (they have a pcie to pci converter between them), "dmidecode -vvv" > will give you more details on the actual layout of things, and given that I > have seen several devices actually run slower by having the ability to > oversubscribe the bandwidth that is available and seemingly actually run > slower because of this ability, that may have some bearing, Ie 2 slower > disks may be faster than 2 fast disks on the pcie just because they don't > oversubscribe the interfere. And given that if there is a pci converter that > may lower the overall bandwidth even more, and cause the issue. If this was > old style ethernet I would have though collisions, but it must just come down > to the arbitration setups not being carefully designed for high utilization, > and high interference between devices. > > Roger > I have ordered a couple 4 port boards (that are PCI-e x4), my next plan of action to acquire > 600MiB/s is as follows: Current: Mobo: 6 drives (full speed) Silicon Image (3 cards, 2 drives each) Future: Mobo: 6 drives (full speed) Silicon Image (3 cards, 1 drive each) Four Port Card in x16 slot (the 3 remaining drives) This should in theory allow 1000 MiB/s.. -- # dmidecode -vvv dmidecode: invalid option -- v Assume you mean lspci: 05:00.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3132 Serial ATA Raid II Controller (rev 01) Subsystem: Silicon Image, Inc. Device 7132 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- Kernel driver in use: sata_sil24 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/