Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:05:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:03:18 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:19987 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:02:11 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [question] implentation of smb-browsing: kernel space or user space? Date: 19 Jan 2002 14:01:45 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2002 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: By author: Urban Widmark In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > I think that using the smb-file-system with a user-space mounter like > > mkautosmb has the problem of bad scalability in large networks, because it > > scans the whole network before you can access one share. > > You don't need to scan on every access. You could run the scanner only if > it was more than x minutes since the last scan. You could run the scanner > independently of any attempts to access autofs. > There is probably no need to even do that. SMB contains a browser list protocol, and Samba (nmbd) can participate in it. You should be able to read it out of there. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/