Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754793AbYGEMnh (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2008 08:43:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752159AbYGEMn2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2008 08:43:28 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:40661 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751784AbYGEMn1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2008 08:43:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" From: David Woodhouse To: Andi Kleen Cc: Olivier Galibert , Takashi Iwai , Hannes Reinecke , Theodore Tso , Jeff Garzik , David Miller , hugh@veritas.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, mchan@broadcom.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <486F67B7.9040304@firstfloor.org> References: <486E2260.5050503@garzik.org> <1215178035.10393.763.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080704141014.GA23215@mit.edu> <486E3622.1000900@suse.de> <1215182557.10393.808.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080704231322.GA4410@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <20080705105317.GA44773@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <486F596C.8050109@firstfloor.org> <20080705120221.GC44773@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <486F6494.8020108@firstfloor.org> <1215260166.10393.816.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <486F67B7.9040304@firstfloor.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:42:59 +0100 Message-Id: <1215261779.10393.829.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1533 Lines: 37 On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 14:23 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > That's a lot of "should" and "in most cases" and "in a ideal world". OK, let's phrase it differently: It almost never happens, and it's trivial to handle it safely in the extremely rare cases that it does. We don't need to start putting firmware in /lib/firmware/`uname -r`/ to deal with it. > What happens when the new firmware is buggy for example and prevents > booting of the system? If the firmware is required for booting the system, then it'll be included in the initramfs. The one on the _real_ file system is therefore irrelevant. When you select the last-known-good kernel from your boot loader you'll actually get the old firmware anyway. And given that we almost never update most of this firmware _either_, it really isn't a problem we should be losing sleep over. But distributors are free to shift it into /lib/firmware/`uname -r`/ if they want to -- it's easy enough to override INSTALL_FW_PATH. For now, though, that isn't compatible with upstream hotplug scripts and would be a bad choice as a default. And if a distribution which actually likes contributing its changes upstream ever starts using /lib/firmware/`uname -r`/, then perhaps we can discuss making it the default for the kernel too. -- dwmw2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/