Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755942AbYGENRS (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2008 09:17:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752876AbYGENRF (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2008 09:17:05 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]:1956 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752614AbYGENRC (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2008 09:17:02 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=GuFhphxbZsUDjFfO8NnWBPNB4SKNxGPzgyEUpGU8Xd9h28MeYreeF8ZxlooRoL03j3 xHDUOXnbVdkd4c8HainPckuu0H+9mxkOhRATnUS1+JRJBR4ANPSBZcPagPoht3dxFXa1 NQgfj81O6R7TH50kmoeiTRBj3nojb2jCIDEGo= Message-ID: <31e679430807050617u3fc706fasee9bb43a151c501f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 16:17:01 +0300 From: "Felipe Balbi" To: "Kernel development list" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Battery life difference MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8dfc966726a479a8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1772 Lines: 52 Hello all, I bought two x61s for testing purposes. One of them is running windows XP and the other one is running clean ubuntu 8.04 with kernel 2.6.24-19. The problem is that on windows that battery lasts around 3h30min and with linux 1h30min. 2 hours is a huge difference. Here's the scenario: . x61s with windows xp wifi on but not connected to any network, bluetooth on, display is in the less brighten state. . x61s with ubuntu 8.04 all radios off (modules removed and hw switch off), display is in the less brighten state. powertop runned and I did what it suggested me to do. Also did some other stuff from thinkwiki on how to reduce power consumption. Well, what could still be using the system power so much ? Are we missing anything on the acpi implementation or is it related to acpi integration to bus and device drivers ? Anything I could help testing and maybe even coding, I started reading the acpi specs and some notes on the linux-acpi website. One thing that called my attention is that D2 and D3 states would require context save/restore opperations (not always true in D2) and I can't see such feature in almost any drivers. We're starting to plan it for omap drivers though due to omap3's pm feature been able to reach off-states, but that's another point and has nothing to do with x86. Anyways, do we reach D2/D3 states anywhere ? I mean without context save/restore we can't reach D3 and almost no D2 as well. Any comments ? -- Best Regards, Felipe Balbi felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/