Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 04:03:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 04:03:20 -0500 Received: from CPEdeadbeef0000.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([24.100.234.67]:17924 "HELO coredump.sh0n.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 04:03:12 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 04:04:03 -0500 (EST) From: Shawn To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Possible Idea with filesystem buffering. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've noticed that XFS's filesystem has a separate pagebuf_daemon to handle caching/buffering. Why not make a kernel page/caching daemon for other filesystems to use (kpagebufd) so that each filesystem can use a kernel daemon interface to handle buffering and caching. I found that XFS's buffering/caching significantly reduced I/O load on the system (with riel's rmap11b + rml's preempt patches and Andre's IDE patch). But I've not been able to acheive the same speed results with ReiserFS :-( Just as we have a filesystem (VFS) layer, why not have a buffering/caching layer for the filesystems to use inconjunction with the VM? Comments, suggestions, flames welcome ;) Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/