Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755350AbYGFI2r (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2008 04:28:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751908AbYGFI2j (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2008 04:28:39 -0400 Received: from nebensachen.de ([195.34.83.29]:39519 "EHLO mail.nebensachen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751855AbYGFI2i (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2008 04:28:38 -0400 X-Hashcash: 1:20:080706:joe@skyrush.com::oz+ByS8Va6w+bKjv:005QmL X-Hashcash: 1:20:080706:andi@firstfloor.org::wt1ltCGxyAKWIC6M:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ejR X-Hashcash: 1:20:080706:alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk::Yw50OdlenpiJ6aym:00000000000000000000000000000000000007m3z X-Hashcash: 1:20:080706:edwintorok@gmail.com::sVNztjjqgK40d7v6:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000DIHJ X-Hashcash: 1:20:080706:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org::j43T3bSGQHgBUj8A:0000000000000000000000000000000002RLW From: Elias Oltmanns To: Joe Peterson Cc: Andi Kleen , Alan Cox , =?iso-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k?= Edwin , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Ctrl+C doesn't interrupt process waiting for I/O References: <48661488.10304@gmail.com> <87fxqurqpz.fsf@denkblock.local> <486E83C3.1040509@skyrush.com> <20080704212335.4ffc8230@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <871w29s5u2.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20080704221457.1f147225@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <486E97F2.8020605@firstfloor.org> <20080704224441.63204bc4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <486E9F91.6010701@firstfloor.org> <20080705113434.41109492@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <486F543D.8010409@firstfloor.org> <87y74gpkb8.fsf@denkblock.local> <486FD270.9030209@skyrush.com> Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:28:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <486FD270.9030209@skyrush.com> (Joe Peterson's message of "Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:58:40 -0600") Message-ID: <87zlovxvpx.fsf@denkblock.local> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1004 Lines: 29 Joe Peterson wrote: > Elias Oltmanns wrote: [...] >> Quite frankly, I'm a bit at a loss as to how I should go about debugging >> this and what kind of data might be useful to others to do so. > > If you can, please try the new patch I attached to the post: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121520229900676&w=2 Sorry, I just forgot to mention that I had already done that. It doesn't make any difference as far as I can see (not that I'm surprised about it). [...] > And also, if you can, try doing 'stty noflsh' and then the test case > again to see if this alters behavior. This may be good to know as well, > even if the flush is not centrally involved in the issue. No, that didn't make any difference either. Regards, Elias -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/