Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756081AbYGGG5S (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 02:57:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751457AbYGGG5H (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 02:57:07 -0400 Received: from po-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.252.154]:39061 "EHLO po-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752762AbYGGG5G (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 02:57:06 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=tU4CyNVwcnwWuDa6nXLyY9OJ9KGd9kTpb7MVAssyACneO/9HJ/7fyAfz4wX49C7Gyn 656+kJXYnGbYc/m0iIxst6MCDJclEshSKTftXnX2bAn3i1e9YzSXzU67iK8o7sYo6Rsn Ka6j7KmEypQNcakaift6UjnHhV7HcW67YUkd0= Message-ID: <86802c440807062357r64385178sa8e24b13dd95ac5f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 23:57:05 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [Bug #10872] x86_64 boot hang when CONFIG_NUMA=n Cc: "Linus Torvalds" , "Randy Dunlap" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Kernel Testers List" In-Reply-To: <20080707063218.GC23583@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080706111750.a6d77e81.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20080707063218.GC23583@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1120 Lines: 34 On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> > This still happens with 2.6.26-rc9. Using CONFIG_NUMA=y boots OK. >> >> Ok, then it wasn't the nr_zones thing. >> >> Since it seems to be repeatable for you, can you bisect it? > > one guess would be: > > | commit e8ee6f0ae5cd860e8e6c02807edfa3c1fa01bcb5 > | Author: Yinghai Lu > | Date: Sun Apr 13 01:41:58 2008 -0700 > | > | x86: work around io allocation overlap of HT links > > but ... since CONFIG_NUMA makes it work, i'm not sure about that. > > Randy, could you post the full CONFIG_NUMA bootlog as well, does it show > any difference in resource allocations? > l looked resource allocations in that bootlog. all my AMD test servers work well with Randy's config (!NUMA) ( Linus tree or tip tree) YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/