Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753536AbYGGJu5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 05:50:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751272AbYGGJut (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 05:50:49 -0400 Received: from E23SMTP02.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.163]:59009 "EHLO e23smtp02.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750807AbYGGJut (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 05:50:49 -0400 Message-ID: <4871E657.3040403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:18:07 +0530 From: Nageswara R Sastry User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Weiner CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, davej@codemonkey.org.uk Subject: Re: [BUG] While changing the cpufreq governor, kernel hits a bug in workqueue.c References: <485F8028.1070302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87y74w41fp.fsf@skyscraper.fehenstaub.lan> <4860BB8E.2070505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87tzfh2t5l.fsf@skyscraper.fehenstaub.lan> <48638906.4090308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87y74l4scd.fsf@skyscraper.fehenstaub.lan> <87fxqp7nye.fsf@skyscraper.fehenstaub.lan> In-Reply-To: <87fxqp7nye.fsf@skyscraper.fehenstaub.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1331 Lines: 37 Hi Johannes, >>> ======================================================= >>> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] >>> 2.6.25.7.cpufreq_patch #2 >>> ------------------------------------------------------- [...] >> Okay, the problem is in cpufreq_conservative.c. We >> cancel_delayed_work_sync() while holding the mutex, but the work itself >> tries to grab it and there it deadlocks; lockdep caught that right. >> >> The hunk for _ondemand is correct, but the one for _conservative is >> obviously wrong, sorry :/ >> >> I will whip something up and get back to you. Thanks a lot for >> testing! > > Could you try the attached patch instead of the one above? > > Dave, I dropped the mutex-grabbing from the conservative worker function > as well as I don't see a reason for it, please correct me if I'm wrong. > > Hannes > The script is running now for more than 6 hours successfully, I will continue this and let you know if there are any failures. * I am seeing the circular locking dependency with the above patch too. Thanks!! Regards R.Nageswara Sastry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/