Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755839AbYGGQTg (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:19:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754342AbYGGQTR (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:19:17 -0400 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:58856 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754096AbYGGQTQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:19:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:19:14 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Grant Grundler Cc: Michael Ellerman , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, davem@davemloft.net, dan.j.williams@intel.com, Martine.Silbermann@hp.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI MSI: Store the number of messages in the msi_desc Message-ID: <20080707161914.GB14894@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080705132728.GO14894@parisc-linux.org> <1215264855-4372-1-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <1215396324.19157.14.camel@localhost> <20080707024125.GU14894@parisc-linux.org> <1215402512.9862.16.camel@localhost> <20080707120418.GZ14894@parisc-linux.org> <20080707160203.GA7521@colo.lackof.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080707160203.GA7521@colo.lackof.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1158 Lines: 27 On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:02:03AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > > - if (!entry->dev || entry->msi_attrib.type != PCI_CAP_ID_MSI) > > + if (!entry->dev || entry->msi_attrib.is_msix) > > return; > > This is why I don't like bit fields. > "uninitialized" (3rd state) doesn't exist. > Is there something else in place to catch that state? > > (It's clearly a bug if someone did that and maybe I'm > being too paranoid.) msi_descs are only allocated in two places, one of which sets is_msix and the other doesn't. I wouldn't object to passing parameters to alloc_msi_entry() so there's only one place that fills in is_msix, but yes, I do think the current code is too paranoid. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/