Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757296AbYGGW6g (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:58:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754351AbYGGW61 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:58:27 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:49862 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753509AbYGGW60 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:58:26 -0400 Message-Id: <20080707225823.502032693@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:58:23 -0700 From: Matt Helsley To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Paul Menage , Pavel Machek , Linux-Kernel , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Linux Containers Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Container Freezer: Reuse Suspend Freezer Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3461 Lines: 94 This patchset reuses the container infrastructure and the swsusp freezer to freeze a group of tasks. The freezer subsystem in the container filesystem defines a file named freezer.state. Writing "FROZEN" to the state file will freeze all tasks in the cgroup. Subsequently writing "RUNNING" will unfreeze the tasks in the cgroup. Reading will return the current state. * Examples of usage : # mkdir /containers/freezer # mount -t cgroup -ofreezer,signal freezer /containers # mkdir /containers/0 # echo $some_pid > /containers/0/tasks to get status of the freezer subsystem : # cat /containers/0/freezer.state RUNNING to freeze all tasks in the container : # echo FROZEN > /containers/0/freezer.state # cat /containers/0/freezer.state FREEZING # cat /containers/0/freezer.state FROZEN to unfreeze all tasks in the container : # echo RUNNING > /containers/0/freezer.state # cat /containers/0/freezer.state RUNNING to kill all tasks in the container : # echo 9 > /containers/0/signal.kill I've reworked Cedric's patches to use task_lock() to protect access to the task's cgroup. Paul, Pavel asked me to send these to Rafael next. They are patches to make the freezer useful for checkpoint/restart using cgroups so it would be nice to get an explicit [N]Ack from you first. Rafael, if Paul agrees, please consider applying these patches. Changes since v3: v4 (Almost all of these changes are confined to patch 3): Reworked the series to use task_lock() instead of RCU. Reworked the series to use write_string() and read_seq_string() cgroup methods. Fixed the race Paul Menage identified. Fixed up check_if_frozen() to do more than just test the FROZEN flag. In some cases tasks could be stopped (T) and marked FREEZING. When that happens we can safely assume that it will be frozen immediately upon waking up in the kernel. Waiting for it to get marked with PF_FROZEN in order to transition to the FROZEN state would block unnecessarily. Removed freezer_ prefix from static functions in cgroup_freezer.c. Simplified STATE_ switch. Updated the locking comments. v3: Ported to 2.6.26-rc5-mm2 with Rafael's freezer patches Tested on 24 combinations of 3 architectures (x86, x86_64, ppc64) with 8 different kernel configs varying power management and cgroup config variables. Each patch builds and boots in these 24 combinations. Passes functional testing. v2 (roughly patches 3 and 5): Moved the "kill" file into a separate cgroup subsystem (signal) and it's own patch. Changed the name of the file from freezer.freeze to freezer.state. Switched from taking 1 and 0 as input to the strings "FROZEN" and "RUNNING", respectively. This helps keep the interface human-usable if/when we need to more states. Checked that stopped or interrupted is "frozen enough" Since try_to_freeze() is called upon wakeup of these tasks this should be fine. This idea comes from recent changes to the freezer. Checked that if (task == current) whilst freezing cgroup we're ok Fixed bug where -EBUSY would always be returned when freezing Added code to handle userspace retries for any remaining -EBUSY Cheers, -Matt Helsley -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/