Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 17:56:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 17:55:46 -0500 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:34184 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 17:55:39 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:55:34 -0700 Message-Id: <200201202255.g0KMtYh15207@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Oliver Feiler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Removing files in devfs In-Reply-To: <20020119094424.A239@gmxpro.net> In-Reply-To: <20020119094424.A239@gmxpro.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oliver Feiler writes: > Hello, > > Is this behaviour supposed to be? > > 9:36 root@kiza /dev# l null > crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 3 Jan 1 1970 null > 9:36 root@kiza /dev# rm null > removing `null' > 9:36 root@kiza /dev# l null > ls: null: No such file or directory > 9:36 root@kiza /dev# > > I have kernel 2.4.16 with devfs and on every other system I > tried I only get "rm: cannot unlink `null': Operation not permitted" > when trying to delete something in devfs. And I cannot see any > differences as far as devfs is concerned on the systems I > tried. devfs compiled in, mounted on boot time, same version of > devfsd. What is "every other system"? Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/