Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:54:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:53:51 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:50441 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:53:35 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:52:51 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Hans Reiser Cc: Shawn Starr , Subject: Re: Possible Idea with filesystem buffering. In-Reply-To: <3C4B645B.8090703@namesys.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Hans Reiser wrote: > Not if you provide a proper design of a master cache manager. > Really, all you have to do is have the subcache managers designed to > free the same number of pages on average in response to pressure, and > to pressure them in proportion to their size, and it is pretty simple > for VM. I take it you're volunteering to bring ext3, XFS, JFS, JFFS2, NFS, the inode & dentry cache and smbfs into shape so reiserfs won't get unbalanced ? regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/