Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757855AbYGIQAb (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:00:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754672AbYGIQAR (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:00:17 -0400 Received: from tomts25.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.188]:39094 "EHLO tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754845AbYGIQAP (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:00:15 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEADV8dEhMQWVt/2dsb2JhbACBW68X Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:00:11 -0400 From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Ingo Molnar Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Masami Hiramatsu , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Hideo AOKI , Takashi Nishiie , Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu Subject: Re: [patch 05/15] LTTng instrumentation - scheduler (repost) Message-ID: <20080709160011.GA10601@Krystal> References: <20080709145929.352201601@polymtl.ca> <20080709150045.025136754@polymtl.ca> <20080709153434.GA9186@Krystal> <20080709153911.GB23339@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080709153911.GB23339@elte.hu> X-Editor: vi X-Info: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080 X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.21.3-grsec (i686) X-Uptime: 11:57:15 up 34 days, 20:38, 4 users, load average: 2.96, 2.45, 2.50 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1188 Lines: 34 * Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote: > > * Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > There were 2 rejects when I ported the patch to linux-next. Sorry. > > Here is a repost. > > there's still a standing objection (NAK) from Peter Zijstra so none of > this can go into linux-next yet i'm afraid. > > Ingo Hi Ingo, This "tracepoint" infrastructure has been created to answer to Peter's concerns about trace_mark uglyness. The last comment I had from him when we discussed the tracepoint idea was "Looking forward to your proposal..", so I guess it's up to him to decide if tracepoints are clean enough to live. I'll submit a revised scheduler instrumentation which turns all scheduler trace_mark() already in linux-next into tracepoints, with the same arguments. ftrace will have to be updated accordingly. Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/