Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754259AbYGISDP (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:03:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752545AbYGISDA (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:03:00 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:60239 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752386AbYGISC7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:02:59 -0400 Message-ID: <4874FD52.8070000@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:02:58 -0700 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jack Steiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses References: <20080709165129.292635000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <4874F4F2.9010603@goop.org> <4874F7D9.5060607@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <4874F7D9.5060607@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1744 Lines: 35 Christoph Lameter wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> The bulk of this series is pda_X to x86_X_percpu conversion. This seems >> like pointless churn to me; there's nothing inherently wrong with the >> pda_X interfaces, and doing this transformation doesn't get us any >> closer to unifying 32 and 64 bit. > > What is the point of the pda_X interface? It does not exist on 32 bit. > The pda wastes the GS segment register on a small memory area. This patchset > makes the GS segment usable to reach all of the per cpu area by placing > the pda into the per cpu area. Thus the pda_X interface becomes obsolete > and the 32 bit per cpu stuff becomes usable under 64 bit unifying both > architectures. > > >> I think we should start devolving things out of the pda in the other >> direction: make a series where each patch takes a member of struct >> x8664_pda, converts it to a per-cpu variable (where possible, the same >> one that 32-bit uses), and updates all the references accordingly. When >> the pda is as empty as it can be, we can look at removing the >> pda-specific interfaces. > > This patchset places the whole x8664_pda structure into the per cpu area and makes the pda macros operate on the x8664_pda structure in the per cpu area. Not sure why you want to go through the churn of doing it for each object separately. I think Jeremy's point is that by removing the pda struct entirely, the references to the fields can be the same for both x86_32 and x86_64. Thanks, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/