Message-ID: <4874FFC4.7050505@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:13:24 -0500
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
References: <20080709165129.292635000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <4874F4F2.9010603@goop.org> <4874F7D9.5060607@linux-foundation.org> <4874FD52.8070000@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <4874FD52.8070000@sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1097
Lines: 17

Mike Travis wrote:

> I think Jeremy's point is that by removing the pda struct entirely, the
> references to the fields can be the same for both x86_32 and x86_64.

That is going to be difficult. The GS register is tied up for the pda area
as long as you have it. And you cannot get rid of the pda because of the library
compatibility issues. We would break binary compatibility if we would get rid of the pda.

If one attempts to remove one field after another then the converted accesses will not be able to use GS relative accesses anymore. This can lead to all sorts of complications.

It will be possible to shrink the pda (as long as we maintain the fields that glibc needs) after this patchset because the pda and the per cpu area can both be reached with the GS register. So (apart from undiscovered surprises) the generated code is the same.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/