Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:35:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:35:26 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:13331 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:35:06 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 03:34:14 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Richard Gooch Cc: Daniel Phillips , "Eric W. Biederman" , Adam Kropelin , Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18pre3-ac1 In-Reply-To: <200201210530.g0L5UQu20723@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Richard Gooch wrote: > Will lazy page table instantiation speed up fork(2) without rmap? > If so, then you've got a problem, because rmap will still be slower > than non-rmap. Linus will happily grab any speedup and make that the > new baseline against which new schemes are compared :-) I guess the difference here is "optimised for lmbench" vs. "optimised to be stable in real workloads" ;) Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/