Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756690AbYGJBMT (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:12:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753087AbYGJBMJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:12:09 -0400 Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:56811 "EHLO out3.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751224AbYGJBMH (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:12:07 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: wffta3kwaZPief2ZqazG8NFMl96S0HBPQd5OITiHLla6 1215652326 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:12:01 -0300 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh To: Ivo van Doorn Cc: Cezary Jackiewicz , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, Len Brown , Richard Purdie , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH -next 2/2] acpi,rfkill,backlight: comapl-laptop update - use rfkill switch subsystem Message-ID: <20080710011201.GC15729@khazad-dum.debian.net> References: <20080709231059.778d16f4@debian> <200807092333.01355.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20080709234419.12d6eabc@debian> <200807092357.28013.IvDoorn@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200807092357.28013.IvDoorn@gmail.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1319 Lines: 28 On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > It is not mandatory if you are writing rfkill support for a driver that does not > come with a rfkill switch. Such drivers can make use of the rfkill events produced > by the hardware which does have such a switch. > > When the hardware does have the rfkill switch, then yes rfkill_force_state() is mandatory. > The get_state() callback function is optional, and allows rfkill to differentiate > between soft and hardblock. Do you want me to mark rfkill_force_state() as mandatory in the docs? It *IS* the preferred way to deal with firmware/hardware-initiated state changes, after all. The rfkill subsystem will limp along without it, even when there are hardware rfkill lines... but no OSD function will work, as the system will pick up the change only when someone reads or writes to the state attribute... -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/