Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753946AbYGJIEq (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:04:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751352AbYGJIE3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:04:29 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.224]:17094 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750922AbYGJIE1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:04:27 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=fzd2SDuU1Qr3TCsDgy2BhR3DNmk3HU+7/ZCP52hv0vphfe1V61nGNBv+QRrY4YJ2hn uSSVSmImnMJEg/dwjhfo5gD6lOLjWBOWEaWZJwXLaUmrk6iXOwOAO8Ojk7AINna4aPao iI6f8yazyloB6tu1SK1uVWRQyjbr4U/RbBSdo= Message-ID: <86802c440807100104s1e1f1cdeg421be2dbeffdcb75@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:04:24 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/05] x86: Rename paravirtualized TSC functions Cc: akataria@vmware.com, "Thomas Gleixner" , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , "Daniel Hecht" , LKML , "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" In-Reply-To: <20080710075030.GA27361@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1214937816.20191.34.camel@promb-2n-dhcp368.eng.vmware.com> <20080709061336.GG9760@elte.hu> <86802c440807090020q516b6332qf8e0d65918e7001e@mail.gmail.com> <1215624603.3930.8.camel@alok-dev1> <86802c440807091038m6c14f165xede8b2b0316d0225@mail.gmail.com> <20080710072201.GE14377@elte.hu> <86802c440807100034w3a3ee192k8e565b75fd2df608@mail.gmail.com> <20080710075030.GA27361@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1817 Lines: 58 On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> > that would be the tip/xen64 stuff, right? Does this revert: >> > >> > | Revert "x86_64: there's no need to preallocate level1_fixmap_pgt" >> > | >> > | This reverts commit 033786969d1d1b5af12a32a19d3a760314d05329. >> > | >> > | Suresh Siddha reported that this broke booting on his 2GB testbox. >> > >> > solve your problems, or are there other problems still? >> >> still is bisecting it now... > > ok. I have no mystery crash on my test-systems. > > by the looks of it, your crashes seem to be pagetable related. If it's > in the tip/xen-64bit branch, my candidates would be: > > 0f38c08: x86: use __page_aligned_data/bss > 0337869: x86_64: there's no need to preallocate level1_fixmap_pgt > 89d7bb5: x86_64: add workaround for no %gs-based percpu > > 0337869 is reverted already. > > Or if it's an older commit, two candidates would be: > > b50efd2: x86: introduce page_size_mask for 64bit > 3a9e189: x86: map UV chipset space - pagetable > > do you know the sha1 of the first broken tree? We know that > tip-history-2008-07-08_16.08_Tue is known-good. first round bisect all works.. it seems make oldconfig change setting between different setting... diff .config config.full.good 4c4 < # Thu Jul 10 00:52:52 2008 --- > # Thu Jul 10 00:40:03 2008 295,296c295 < CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL=y < CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y --- > # CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is not set it seems some recent change doesn't like stackprotector. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/