Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756775AbYGJINA (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:13:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756505AbYGJIMZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:12:25 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:52191 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754462AbYGJIMY (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:12:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:12:06 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Yinghai Lu Cc: akataria@vmware.com, Thomas Gleixner , the arch/x86 maintainers , Daniel Hecht , LKML , Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/05] x86: Rename paravirtualized TSC functions Message-ID: <20080710081206.GA4819@elte.hu> References: <1214937816.20191.34.camel@promb-2n-dhcp368.eng.vmware.com> <20080709061336.GG9760@elte.hu> <86802c440807090020q516b6332qf8e0d65918e7001e@mail.gmail.com> <1215624603.3930.8.camel@alok-dev1> <86802c440807091038m6c14f165xede8b2b0316d0225@mail.gmail.com> <20080710072201.GE14377@elte.hu> <86802c440807100034w3a3ee192k8e565b75fd2df608@mail.gmail.com> <20080710075030.GA27361@elte.hu> <86802c440807100104s1e1f1cdeg421be2dbeffdcb75@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86802c440807100104s1e1f1cdeg421be2dbeffdcb75@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1144 Lines: 40 * Yinghai Lu wrote: > first round bisect all works.. > > it seems make oldconfig change setting between different setting... yeah. The thing i do is this: i create a .config.bisect and at every bisection step i copy it into .config and do a 'make oldconfig'. this means that options are picked up again, even if a 'dive back into the past' causes a bisection point to lose a config setting. > > diff .config config.full.good > 4c4 > < # Thu Jul 10 00:52:52 2008 > --- > > # Thu Jul 10 00:40:03 2008 > 295,296c295 > < CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL=y > < CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y > --- > > # CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is not set > > it seems some recent change doesn't like stackprotector. then my guess would be on: 89d7bb5: x86_64: add workaround for no %gs-based percpu you might want to try your luck and revert that one alone from latest tip/master. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/