Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757002AbYGJOTV (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:19:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754580AbYGJOTN (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:19:13 -0400 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:24853 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754255AbYGJOTM (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:19:12 -0400 Subject: Re: Higher than expected disk write(2) latency From: Chris Mason To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Martin Lucina , Andrew Morton , Martin Sustrik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <20080710070151.5fccbbcf@infradead.org> References: <20080628121131.GA14181@nodbug.moloch.sk> <20080709222701.8eab4924.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4875C45C.2010901@fastmq.com> <20080710011417.95532d51.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1215696541.24425.214.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20080710134144.GA31461@dezo.moloch.sk> <20080710070151.5fccbbcf@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:18:32 -0400 Message-Id: <1215699512.24425.218.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1389 Lines: 38 On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 07:01 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:41:46 +0200 > Martin Lucina wrote: > > > chris.mason@oracle.com said: > > > Is NCQ enabled on the drive? The basic way to fix this is to have > > > multiple requests in flight, which isn't going to happen on sata > > > with the cache off and with ncq off. > > > > ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) > > ata1.00: ATA-7: Hitachi HDS721616PLA380, P22OAB3A, max UDMA/133 > > ata1.00: 321672960 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) > > ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 > > > > I'm assuming the above indicates NCQ is enabled. > > > > We'll try running the tests tomorrow with different i/o schedulers and > > report back. > > > another thing to try is using AHCI mode instead; AHCI tends to be > higher performance > > (and.. for fun try to run latencytop during a run, to see if maybe > there are unsuspected delay causes) > Any latencies during submit (at least for kernel aio) are probably from get_request_wait, but the numbers so far look like they are only seeing one request in flight at a time. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/