Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758046AbYGJPP0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:15:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756273AbYGJPPK (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:15:10 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]:6292 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752354AbYGJPPI (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:15:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=bcQAXwlyUFhVS+4CzqBpNTiEXZSULnpGSKnmDC5g5oAN20fDqJ3djzPKs/kp/R2bEH idNhoOcG6V+DnbltqhydTsHI6h6m5WbwpfoaTskvVwNWckrQgK+Ass6JUez/Kfj7YC7D BTwaFIOtfIIsi7hwhbBT1731zgWkSGIgaMfeE= Message-ID: <1ba2fa240807100815j6bda3c63q4fc4d0c5da826fe3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:15:07 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "Johannes Berg" Subject: Re: Linux Wireless Mini-Summit -- Ottawa -- July 22, 2008 Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1215700309.3483.21.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080709190915.GA8238@tuxdriver.com> <1215700309.3483.21.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1107 Lines: 30 On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> 1500 Future work > > Maybe something about testing? Or I'll do a testing brainstorming > session after dinner. > > Obviously, testing at orbit never worked out, but it'd be good to have > _something_ other than everybody testing their thing locally. Ties in > with the virtual hardware, maybe? > >From the driver perspective it would be loop back phy (tx/rx), The peer side might be running on virtual HW. Currently it's not easy to establish automated regression over the air. Good portion of the flows can be tested this way. I'm also looking for easier bug reporting for unexperienced users maybe some uevent/HAL popping to application and emails it out/. Not sure really how to handle this and not create spams. I'm just expecting more real 'end users'. Thanks Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/