Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 05:42:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 05:42:17 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-197-0-76.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.197.0.76]:4879 "HELO www.pmonta.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 05:42:05 -0500 From: Peter Monta To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: APIC errors, Asus A7M266-D (760MPX chipset) Message-Id: <20020121104204.971231C5@www.pmonta.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 02:42:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm getting a storm of APIC errors with an Asus A7M266-D motherboard at the beginning of boot (and no further boot progress is made). The console message is "APIC error on CPU0: 04(04)". A single Athlon MP 1200 is installed; the kernel is compiled with SMP=n but both "local APIC" and "use IO-APIC" are enabled. I'm using 2.5.2pre10. Oddly, booting this same kernel with the "noapic" option results in the same problem, but recompiling with all APIC options disabled gives a successful boot. While running in this legacy interrupt mode there seem to be a lot of ERR: interrupts in /proc/interrupts, in fact about five times as many as "real" ones listed above. Does this affect performance? How much is interrupt latency increased when the APIC bus must reissue commands like this (if I understand the documentation correctly)? Cheers, Peter Monta - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/