Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 06:30:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 06:30:22 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:61189 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 06:30:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:29:54 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Vojtech Pavlik Cc: Andre Hedrick , Davide Libenzi , Anton Altaparmakov , Linus Torvalds , lkml Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.3-pre1-aia1 Message-ID: <20020121122954.Z27835@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20020121114311.A24604@suse.cz> <20020121114830.W27835@suse.de> <20020121121456.A24656@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020121121456.A24656@suse.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 21 2002, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > I always thought it is like this (and this is what I still believe after > having read the sprcification): > > --- > SET_MUTIPLE 16 sectors > --- > READ_MULTIPLE 24 sectors > IRQ > PIO transfer 16 sectors > IRQ > PIO transfer 8 sectors > --- > > Where am I wrong? I agree completely, see previous mail. > By the way, the device *isn't* required to support any lower multiple > count than the maximum one it advertizes. Ugly. Oh? That basically narrows down the multi count value from hdparm to a boolean on-or-off. I'd be surprised to see any drives break with lower multi count in real life, though.. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/