Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 06:35:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 06:34:53 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:8454 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 06:34:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:34:30 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Vojtech Pavlik Cc: Andre Hedrick , Davide Libenzi , Anton Altaparmakov , Linus Torvalds , lkml Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.3-pre1-aia1 Message-ID: <20020121123430.B27835@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20020121114311.A24604@suse.cz> <20020121123243.A24754@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020121123243.A24754@suse.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 21 2002, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > If the device is programmed for to do 16 sectors in multimode, it and you > > issue a read/write multiple pio and short change the device it is not > > going to like it. However if it is programmed for multimode and you issue > > single sector pio transfers command opcodes it is fine. > > > > Do we differ? > > I think so. Check my mail from 11:14:56 GMT today. I fully understand > that if I supply less data to the device than it expects or get less > from it than it has, it'll be a problem. But I think the specification > doesn't prohibit reading amounts not divisible by multimode setting via > the multimode command. I've read it quite carefully again. Like I said, if this was indeed a problem it would be _trivial_ to break 2.2/2.4 IDE with enabled multi mode... Basically it would be hard to get _anything_ done. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/