Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:39:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:39:20 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:57516 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:39:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 05:37:24 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020121.053724.124970557.davem@redhat.com> To: reid.hekman@ndsu.nodak.edu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@zip.com.au, alan@lxorg.ukuu.org Subject: Re: Athlon PSE/AGP Bug From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1011610422.13864.24.camel@zeus> In-Reply-To: <1011610422.13864.24.camel@zeus> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Reid Hekman Date: 21 Jan 2002 04:53:39 -0600 As I have a couple systems that may/may not be affected, I'm seeking some clarification. Is this an effect of the errata published by AMD in the Athlon models 4 & 6 revision guides as "INVLPG Instruction Does Not Flush Entire Four-Megabyte Page Properly with Certain Linear Addresses"? That errata lists all Athlon Thunderbirds as affected and all Athlon Palominos except for stepping A5. Regardless of specific errata listings, will future workarounds be enabled based on cpuid or via a test for the bug itself? The funny part is, if this published errata is the problem, it cannot be a problem under Linux since we never invalidate 4MB pages. We create them at boot time and they never change after that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/